Without fertile soil, what is life?

There is no alternative to fertile soil to sustain life on Earth. Soil fertility is the very basis of sustainable food production and food security. It is living soil that provides sustainable alternatives to the triple crises of climate, energy and food.  All living things, including humans, need food of one kind or another. Life also depends on air and water, but nothing can live with air and water alone. Living things not directly rooted in the soil – things that live in the sea, on rocks, or on trees, for example – still require minerals that come from the earth. They must have “soil” from somewhere. Living things other than plants get their food from plants or from other living things that feed on plants and plants feed on the soil. By one means of another, all life is rooted in the soil. The purpose of a sustainable agriculture is to sustain human life, and thus, sustainable farming must be rooted in the soil.

In times not too long past, the connection between soil and human life was clear and ever present. Little more than a century ago, most people were farmers and those who were not lived close enough to a farm to know that the food that gave them life came from the soil. They knew that if the soil was rich, if the rains came and the temperature was hospitable to plants and animals, food would be bountiful, and there would be plenty to eat. They knew that when droughts came, plants dried out then died, the soil was left bare, and there was little to eat. They knew when the floods came, plants were covered with water and died, the soil was left bare, and there was little to eat. They knew very well that their physical well-being, if not their lives, depended on the things that came from the soil. 

Today, the connection between soil and life is no less critical but is no longer so direct or so clear. Most urban dwellers also have lost all sense of personal connection to the farm or the soil. During most of the past century many people living in cities either had lived on a farm at one time or knew someone, usually a close relative, who still lived on a farm. Their connection with farming gave them some understanding of their connectedness with the soil. At least they knew that “land” meant something more than just a place to play or space to be filled with some form of “development.” But these personal connections have been lost with the aging of urbanization. One of the most common laments among farmers today is that “people no longer know where their food comes from.” For most, any real understanding of the direct connection between soil and life has been lost. It’s sad but true.

The natural productivity of our soils has been degraded, have destroyed the ability of farms to support rural economies, and have diminished the sustainability of human society. If we are to build a sustainable society, scientists of all disciplines eventually must address the full ecological, economic, and social implications of their work. But, the science of sustainability must begin with sustaining the life of our soils – where roots of a sustainable agriculture must grow. 

We can conclude that the lost of fertile soil will effect tomorrow's world. If there are to be productive soils in the future, we must conserve and make wise use of the soils we have today. The soil that washes down our rivers to the sea is no more renewable than are the fossil fuels that we are mining from ancient deposits within the earth. In spite of our best efforts, some quantity of soil will be lost – at least lost to our use. Thus, our only hope for sustaining soil productivity is to conserve as much soil as we can and to build up soil organic matter and enhance the productivity of the soil that remains.

Resources:

http://oklahoma.sierraclub.org/greencountry/Pages/soil.htm

http://www.resurgence.org/magazine/article2879-soil-not-oil.html

Ministry of the Environment Web site. "Environmental Quality Standards for Soil Pollution." Available from http://www.env.go.jp/en/lar/regulation/sp.html .

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Web site. "Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act." Available from http://www.epa.gov.tw/english/laws/soil.htm

http://www.terratechnik.ca/articles01.php

A Barren Future: Not Even A Drop of Water

Looking back decades ago, people would simply dismiss the thought that water would soon disappear, that water would soon dry out from dams and there would not even be a single drop to drink or it would not even be possible to keep a flowerpot. Years ago, one would have been a laughing stock for uttering such an idea.

 People are taking water for granted, not knowing that it would soon dry out. However, no matter how unimaginable it could be, our future is slowly turning towards that end. From what I can remember, months ago, the Philippines had a glimpse of this terrible future when the dams had a shortage of water supply. It had been a scorching hot summer for us and for our dams as well due to El Niño. Around the month of July, the water levels of Angat Dam and Magat Dam as well as the other dams in the country had gone into an all time low. Based on the reports on TV and on articles from the newspapers, the Angat Dam which supplies water for Bulacan, Pampanga and NCR had steadily dropped during the El Niño phenomenon causing problems on servicing the residents of the said areas. Residents were short of drinking water. Farmers’ plants and crops were thirsty and drying. Ponds had also dried out. Strife and fear had started to set because of the possible drought. Some had lost their livelihood.

Though the drought lasted only for a few long months, it had created a buzz. People started to fear for the future. People started to contemplate how long our water sources will lasts. There’s no question on people’s fear. When were out of oil, were out of energy and our economy is down. When were out of money, were out of power. But when were out of water, were out of life. I’m not saying that water is the sole source of life. Yet I wanted to point out that much of our life depends on it. If water would run out in our dams and rivers, plants and crops would soon die out and we would soon run out of food. Lights and power will soon be out because a large part of our electricity supply comes from hydrothermal energy. Lands will barren. Flora and fauna would disappear. People would starve. People and countries would fight over water and there would be chaos. Perhaps, a single drop of water would be even be priced as high as a diamond? Not impossible. What a dreadful future it could be!

Unfortunately, there is no possible alternative for water. There are other sources of electricity such as nuclear energy and solar energy but nothing can replace water in the life of man and plants alike. Water shortage on dams could be eased by cloud seeding, water recycling, water use management and conservation of course. However, global warming is taking a toll in our planet. Compared to the droughts we had experienced on the past, the droughts we could possibly have in the future might be worse. Cloud seeding won’t be enough to replenish the future shortage on water. All we could possibly do is to start working things now. Value what we have today and take a tight grip on it so we won’t lose it. Conservation is the key. Also, we would have to value other elements of our nature because the loss of any part of it would equate to the loss of the whole. If we won’t start doing this today, we might as well pray that a miracle would just happen out of nowhere? It could be miracle wherein we would be able to live without water in the future. Or let’s say that scientist were able to discover a replacement of water. Either way, it’s our choice. Our future lies in our hands.

RH Bill: Which side are you?

The Reproductive Health Bill has been on the news for quite some time now. There have been too many controversies and started many debates regarding its moral and economic implications.

At first, I wanted to support the bill because I thought that the cause of poverty in the Philippines is caused by overpopulation. However, reading some of the articles about reproductive health bill made me realized that there is something wrong about the bill. The bill tells us that “we” have the choice to conceive a child or not. But whoever said that we have the authority to determine whom we want to conceive. It is only God who has the power to create, give, and destroy life. Definitely, I believe that if the bill would be approved, chance are men and women would have sex as long as they want  because anyway, contraceptives are now readily available and widely distributed. It would degrade the true essence of sexual intercourse which is a sign of intimate love between the couple and a way to procreate, “create” life. I was surprised to know that there were some people, who are supporting the bill, who said that RH Bill promotes gender equality. The latest SWS survey indicated that seven of every 10 respondents do favor the reproductive health bill and The Pulse Asia survey showed that 69 percent of Filipinos favor the Reproductive Health (RH) bill.

I’m sorry to say it, but the Reproductive Health Bill will become a law. Suppose that in fact, HB 5043 was unanimously approved at the House of Representatives when Members voted today on Third and Final Reading. Consider further that when transmitted to the Senate, it was likewise approved through a counterpart Senate bill and that in a subsequent bicameral conference; this 14th Congress would in fact have approved the bill for Pinoys’s final signature and approval. We have a new law.

What would the days be after today when the law would have been firmly erected to govern the lives of families, married couples, parents, women, children, adults? What will schools, churches, hospitals do? What will be the evolving new moral order? These are some of the questions that will emerge if the bill has been passed.

Truly, contraceptive pills will flood the market to the extent that perhaps, young girls can buy them at the nearest sari-sari store in much the same way that young boys can buy every kind of condom from every nearby outlet that perhaps, even cigarette vendors may have to sell condoms as they sell candies and cigarettes in the streets. Pharmaceuticals will produce millions of contraceptive pills per day as they would sell like hot potato. Industries into the sale of silicone or rubber as a raw material will experience a boom. Beauty parlors might even have to sell condoms; pills as well if not in fact have services for IUDS, whatever.

By making condoms or pills very much available from every outlet, students in high school will have little to worry about getting into teen-age or pre-marital sex since the law has opened the door wide open for so-called ‘freedom of choice’. This simply means that children have the right over their bodies and this literally enough includes that right to have an abortion in case they somehow get pregnant and they know their parents would not approve of it. Young boys feel safe and therefore think they can engage in teen-age sex with anyone in the opposite sex comforted with the thought that in using condoms, they don’t have to get the girls impregnated. The Bill would just pave the way to decrease the number of newborn babies and eventually diminishing the number of the working age group. Thus, giving rise to another dilemma.

A whole compendium of literature has already been documented proving how this contemporary social orientation has destroyed the homes, families, marriages, youth, children, women, parents. Are we here to let this happen to our own national domain? The first five years after the law is erected, futuristic wise, will tell just how bad we have gone with the RH bill enacted into law.

I believe that the Bill is trying to generate more problems—problems related to morality and economics. I think the legislators would have to think of another solution to family planning that would not involve "killing a child" and permitting men and women to freely have sex for the sake of pleasure and not for procreation.

Magda

Newspapers, radio, television… RH bill is on the news for quite some time. It has been an argument for people against that bill, and for those who pursue that that bill be implemented. But, before I state my side on whether I am PRO or against RH Bill, let me first give you a glimpse on what RH Bill is really all about:

The Reproductive Health Bill and Population Development Act of 2008, (RH Bill) seeks government funding for population management programs that would provide reproductive health education and would give access to both natural and artificial family planning methods to all Filipinos. According to the House of Representatives by Albay 1st District Rep. Edcel Ladman, primary author of the bill, central to the RH bill is “the exercise of freedom of informed choice by women and couples on what method of family planning they want to adopt”.

Coverage of RH Bill:

1. Information and access to natural and modern family planning.

2. Maternal, infant and child health and nutrition.

3. Promotion of breast feeding.

4. Prevention of abortion and management of post-abortion complications.

5. Adolescent and youth health.

6. Prevention and management of reproductive tract infections, HIV/AIDS and STDs.

7. Elimination of violence against women.

8. Counseling on sexuality and sexual and reproductive health.

9. Treatment of breast and reproductive tract cancers.

10. Male involvement and participation in Reproductive Health.

11. Prevention and treatment of infertility.

12. Reproductive Health education for the youth.

So given that glimpse of what RH bill is all about, we have seen that it has the purpose of educating the Filipinos about family planning. It does not promote abortion; counseling will be given to the people and all other stuff about family planning. For me, family planning might sound to be the answer for our greatest problem in our country, which is Poverty due to OVERPOPULATION. But, if we just analyze deeper, it will never be the answer, as OVERPOPULATON is not the problem in the first place. SO, MY SIDE??? I AM AGAINST IT.. Why? for that main reason, OVERPOPULATION is still not our main problem.

So, what is our main problem, for me?.. simply CORRUPTION! If the government will just be honest in their work, then I don’t think our BELOVED COUNTRY will still a third world country.

And…. RH bill is not the answer. It is not a bill that will answer to every BIGGER and more SERIOUS problem we have. They say that it will help, but as I can see it…if it might help.. the result will just be seen on the long run term…. maybe on the next 20 years??? Ooh..that is just so long time for us to wait…the government, and FILIPINOS, should be focusing on what we need as of the moment. SO.. if we are just NOT corrupt on our own way, and of course THE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, then this country will boom on its fullest potential.

LASTLY, I am PRO-life, using condoms is also another way of impeding LIFE…

HELLAINE

               

Disputes that cloud the Reproductive Health Bill with controversy are continuing. In fact, each side, the pros and the cons, had bombarded the media with negative propagandas in order to discredit the claim of the other. The confused public is trapped in between, not knowing what side to take. Who wouldn’t be confused if the main issue on hand is about morality?

                Although the RH Bill deals with various issues, it seemed that the issue of morality of the family planning methods and sex education had taken the spotlight. For the people behind the anti-RH Bill campaign which is led by the Catholic Church, the provisions of the bill especially the ones which encourage the use of contraceptives are not in line with the moral beliefs and teachings of Catholicism. For them, the use of contraceptives is anti-life in the sense that these are disguised form of abortion. Abortion is the killing of the implanted fertilized egg that is expected to grow into a fetus that will soon be born as a baby.  In addition, it is said that the teachings of the Bible declares that people should “go and multiply” and not to restrict the children a family could have.

                Indeed, everyone agrees that abortion is morally and legally wrong. In fact, punitive punishment awaits those who practice abortion. However, contraception can’t be easily coined as a form of abortion. Isn’t it that the basic reason why the use of contraceptives is encouraged is to prevent the occurrence of unwanted pregnancies that could eventually lead to abortion? To shed light on things, contraception is merely the prevention of fertilization of the human egg. It can be done either by killing the sperms or by preventing the ovulation of the egg. In either ways, the meeting of the egg and sperm will be prevented leading to the prevention of having a fertilized egg. If there is no fertilized egg, there is no unwanted pregnancy. If there is no unwanted pregnancy, there is no reason for people to consider practicing abortion. Families and couples alike can plan their life. Having a planned life would mean that there would be a sustainable and happy family that awaits those children who will soon be born. Children will be wanted and won’t be blamed for the miseries of poverty. What is the use of multiplying if the children would eventually suffer and die because of poverty? Isn’t it better to know that the child that will be born is assured to grow and enjoy life at the fullest?

                Moreover, the Reproductive Health Bill is also concerned with sex education wherein students will be taught the basics about reproductive health as early as they reach Grade 5. For the critics of the RH bill it is not right to suggest teaching about sex on students since it will only liberate them more. The fear of developing the students into “sex maniacs” also alarms them. Aside from that, children are expected to learn sex-related matters from their parents and not from their teachers. However, it is better to open the eyes of the youth regarding these matters as early as possible than to leave them not knowing what to do. If the students will remain uneducated regarding these matters, their curiosity will be intensified which could provoke them to indulge into these activities earlier and unguided. The age of teenagers that indulge in premarital sex and get unwanted pregnancies are getting younger and younger. In fact, there are reported cases that children as early as 12-13 years old indulge in premarital sex. The situation demands for an urgent action. By educating students regarding reproductive health, the dangers and consequences associated with the indulgence in sex, sex-related diseases, natural and artificial means of family planning and moral values as well, the students will gain a powerful tool to battle the uncertainties that they face making them more equipped to make sound decisions for their future. In addition, the teachers are no strangers to students because they serve as their second parents. The training and knowledge they have of reproductive health matters in addition to the trust of their students makes the teachers fully capable to deliver the requirements of the said course.

                In addition, the RH Bill is not only concerned with the family planning and sex education issue. It also tries to address matters regarding adolescent and youth health, treatment of breast and reproductive tract cancers as well as AIDS, and elimination of violence against women.

                However, no matter how good the provisions of the Reproductive Health Bill are, it would remain useless if important matters won’t be addressed. First and foremost, the oppositions and contradictions that discredit it pose a large threat on its proper implementation. If the government as well as the proponents of the bill won’t be able to do anything to alleviate the tension and gain cooperation from the critics, the bill will continue to go on encountering serious bottlenecks. As history suggest, oppositions does not do any good. Second, the people should want to change in order to have change. If people still go on their old ways and does not adopt the new way of life suggested by the bill, there won’t be any change at all and the same old problems will still be there. Lastly, proper implementation is needed. The government must not only have a plan of action but it must also put this plan into action with the absence of any HOCUS POCUS in order for the bill to completely serve its intended purpose which is the welfare of the Filipinos.

LOURDES

Population growth is one of the thousand dilemmas that the world—not only the Philippines is facing. This is the main reason why experts, not to mention scientists around the globe created contraceptives or birth control methods in order to prevent this very sharp increase in world populace.  Moreover, people who have growing concerns over the health of families, both parents and children, around the world also see that these contraceptives are ways to prevent certain sickness.

Here in the Philippines, the legislative body has proposed the Reproductive Health Bill (RHB) which promotes the use of birth control methods that have been tried and tested by experts worldwide. In this country where there is an overwhelming number of inhabitants, it is really undeniable that families who belong in the lower level of the society are those who have lots of children and are unable to provide the basic needs or necessities of the whole family particularly food and shelter.

It is true that the Catholic Church advocates an alternative way of promoting population control but it excludes the use of contraceptives which is directly in contrast with what the Government proposes through the Reproductive Health Bill. The Catholic Church believes that the best way to control the population growth is for couples or families to practice natural birth control methods like abstinence, which according to them is in accordance with what is written in the Bible. However, nowadays, people especially here in the Philippines, do not have the enough discipline that the Church requires.

As an individual having a freedom of thought and speech, I want to say that I am in favor of the Reproductive Health Bill because logically speaking, RHB is pushed through by the Philippine government because it is safe, effective, and easy to use. Having agreed to using contraceptives does not mean that I am also in favor of abortion. I do not agree with what the church is trying to say that the use of these birth control methods is a form of abortion since there is no life that will be destroyed in using contraceptives.           

Lastly, I would like to point out that the Reproductive Health Bill is not proposed to destroy life; rather the bill is advocated in order to improve the living condition of Filipinos since we will be able to learn discipline and to be responsible citizens of this country. Moreover, RHB is designed to make Filipino parents be able to support the needs of their family by building a household that they can really support. The Reproductive Health Bill should be seen as another step to modernisation and a way to renounce the old- fashioned ways which were proven to be unhealthy and ineffective.

JOANNA MAE

Ten Most Significant Inventions

Barcode, 1973             
Barcodes were conceived as a kind of visual Morse code by a Philadelphia student in 1952, but retailers were slow to take up the technology, which could be unreliable. That changed in the early 1970s when the same student, Norman Woodland, then employed by IBM, devised the Universal Product Code. Since then, black stripes have appeared on almost everything we buy, a ubiquity fuelled by their price – it costs about a tenth of a penny to slap on a barcode.

The internet, 1969           
The simplest way to illustrate the inestimable impact of the internet is to chart the growth in the number of people connected to it: from just four in 1969 to 50,000 in 1988; a million by 1991 and 500 million by 2001. And today - 1.2 billion, or 19 per cent of the world's population use the internet. Conceived by the US Department of Defense in the 1960s, the internet, together with the World Wide Web, invented in 1989 by Brit techie, Tim Berners-Lee, has shrunk the world like no other invention.

Fridge, 1834               
Jacob Perkins was the first to describe how pipes filled with volatile chemicals whose molecules evaporated very easily could keep food cool, like wind chilling your skin after a dip in the sea. But he neglected to publish his invention and its evolution was slow – fridges would not be commonplace for another 100 years.

Light bulb, 1848          
Joseph Swan in fact developed a bulb before Thomas Edison, but the pair later joined forces and share credit for creating the gadget we perhaps take for granted more than any other.

Telephone, 1876              
Frenchman Charles Bourseul first proposed transmitting speech electronically in 1854, but he was ahead of his time and it took another six years before Johann Reis used a cork, knitting needle, sausage skin and a piece of platinum to transmit sound, if not intelligible speech (that took another 16 years). Elisha Gray and Alexander Graham Bell raced to make the first working phone in the 1870s, Bell winning in a photo-finish. Today there are 1.3 billion phone lines in use around the world.

Mobile phone, 1947         
There are more than two billion mobile phones in the world, and the EU is home to more "cells", as the American's call them, than people. It is difficult to quantify the economic and social impact of the device – of all the gadgets in the average person's arsenal, it is surely the one we would be worst off without. Those who disagree can blame Bell Laboratories for their invention; the firm introduced the first service in Missouri in 1947. Widespread coverage in Britain did not begin until the late 1980s.

Microscope, 1590          
When the British polymath Robert Hooke published his 1665 masterpiece, Micrographia, people were blown away by its depictions of the miniature world. Samuel Pepys called it "the most ingenious book that I ever read in my life". Until then, few people knew that fleas had hairy legs or that plants comprised cells (Hooke coined the term "cell"). Zacharias Janssen, a Dutch spectacle maker, had invented the first microscope in 1590, although it was then regarded as a novelty rather than a revolution in science.

Computer, 1935-1938         

Konrad Zuse builds Z1, world's first program-controlled computer. Despite certain mechanical engineering problems it had all the basic ingredients of modern machines, using the binary system and today's standard separation of storage and control. Zuse's 1936 patent application (Z23139/GMD Nr. 005/021) also suggests a von Neumann architecture (re-invented in 1945) with program and data modifiable in storage.

Syringe, 1844                  
Syringe devices have been in use since the 9th century, when an Egyptian surgeon used a glass suction tube to remove cataracts from a patient, but the first hypodermic syringes with needles fine enough to pierce skin did not appear until the 1840s. The Irish physician Francis Rynd used the first syringe to inject a sedative to treat neuralgia, revolutionising medicine with a single push of a plunger.

Battery, 1800                  
For the battery we must thank the frog. In the 1780s, the Italian physicist Luigi Galvani discovered that a dead frog's leg would twitch when he touched it with two pieces of metal. Galvani had created a crude circuit and the phenomenon was taken up by his friend, the aristocratic Professor Alessandro Volta, whose voltaic cells stacked in a Voltaic pile amazed Napoleon. The pile was also the first battery, whose successors power more than a third of the gadgets on this list.

Me and my phone

Cellphone!, who  among us doesn’t have one? --even a 3 year old child has one. We already know what mobile phones are. Right? According to webopedia.com, a mobile phone is electronic telecommunications device often referred to as a cellular phone. Mobile phones connect to a wireless communications network through radio wave or satellite transmissions. Most mobile phones provide voice communications, Short Message Service (SMS), Multimedia Message Service (MMS), and newer phones may also provide Internet services such as Web browsing and e-mail.

 

In today's world, most people communicate through the use cellular phones. It's hard to believe that fifteen years ago cell phones were a rarity.  Cell phones may be new devices, but they originated in the 1920’s. The concept of the cellular phone was developed in 1947 which originated from the mobile car phone. The concept of the cellular phone was produced by Bell Laboratories. In 1973 Dr Martin Cooper, considered as the inventor of the first portable handset, made the first actual cell phone. Motorola touts a prototype of the world's first mobile cellular phone, the Motorola DynaTAC 8000X. Public cell phone testing began during1977. The city of Chicago was where the first trials began with 2000 customers, and eventually other cell phone trials appeared in the Washington D.C. and Baltimore area. In 1982, Nokia introduces its first mobile phone, the Nokia Mobira Senator. Before Palm acquired Handspring, the company released its Handspring Treo 180 cellular phone in 2001, which came in two versions. The Treo 180 was available with a QWERTY keyboard as well as in a separate version with text input method called Graffiti. The BlackBerry 5810 hits the market in 2002, and though it's not the first BlackBerry, it's the first such device from Research In Motion (RIM) to include voice functionality--though a headset is required because it doesn't have an external microphone or speaker. Motorola announces its RAZR v3 cell phone in 2004 and starts a trend toward ultra-thin, stylish phones that's still influencing mobile device manufacturers today. In 2007 Apple releases the iPhone, a beautifully designed device that includes an innovative--and much hyped up--touch screen navigation interface, which doesn't require the use of a stylus. 

One cannot deny the fact that cell phones is one of the most popular gadget all over the world, as it is not just a fashion accessory anymore, but is a gadget that has lots of use and benefits.

            One main use of our cell phone is as a means of communication. Cell phone made life our easier, that it allows us to stay connected with the world no matter where we are. Unlike before that our means of communication is by sending mails where we have to wait days or even weeks for that letter to arrive. Cell phone is so important now that it gives as the access to send messages as quickly as we want. Another use of it is that it can be our database, where we can save information of our friends, family members and anyone we want. With the use of our cell phone, we can get rid off our pen and paper when we have data to keep. An added benefit of our cell phone is its applications --calendar, notes and task applications where we can input there our important dates in our life to be remembered, --alarm clock where it is useful for us when we have to be awake in the early morning for us not to be late in our class, or work.

            Cell phone also has the feature of internet connection, where we can connect to the internet with the use of our GPRS connection, for FREE! if you know how to set the internet settings of your phone. J Additional features are the e-games on our cellular phone, where it can be a way to unwind it the midst of a stressing work. Lastly would be the camera feature of our cellular phone. It is so useful because it can capture shots of our everyday activities that we need not to bring anymore a digicam, just to have those memorable shots. In a nutshell, the benefits of having a cell phone are just so many that it can now be named as an all-in-one gadget. J

For most of us, our cellular phones are gifts from heaven- meant to solve our problems and satisfy our unending needs, as stated above. However, all good things just have a downside with them. Cell phones are really getting smarter and smarter with all sorts of applications and devices embedded in them making our life better but some inconveniences come with their use. First on the list is a dying battery. How can anyone not feel sorry when her cell phone just cuts off when it is most needed just like when you are trying to make an urgent phone call or waiting for an important message. In fact, most of us had experienced this problem more than once. At times when the phone is in its “frozen state” because of its dying battery it fails to serve its purpose. It can’t be used to for text messaging or making no phone calls nor can its high-tech application be utilized. So what’s the use? It just has to be kept in our pockets until we get home and charge it. However, charging is another frustrating problem with cell phones. You may charge it for hours, take it off when you need to go but still see the low battery indicator after using it only for a few hours. It is as if the hours of charging haven’t done it any good to make it last. In more severe cases, a replacement battery or charger needs to be purchased to resolve the problem. However, purchasing a brand new cellular phone is a more desirable option in some instances. The money spent on replacement batteries, charger or brand new phone serves as an additional expense for us users. Another foe of cell phone users is the weak reception or signal making it hard to connect with others. The weak signal tends to make phone calls “choppy” causing miscommunication and misunderstanding between the receiver and sender. Also, it creates difficulty in receiving and sending of messages causing disruptions in the communication process. Aside from these shortcomings, the health-related problem that may arise from its use is also feared by many. A lot of news had circulated stating that the use of cellular phone can cause cancer and other serious health hazards due to the emittance of radiofrequency energy. However, studies have shown that there is no proven association between the RF from cell phone use and health hazards. Still caution should be taken by users because too much exposure to large amounts of RF energy can increase body temperature and cause tissue damage. Indeed, cellular phones are one of the major technological advancements that had crafted a new and better way of living but we should also accept the fact that the uses of it have some drawbacks we must deal with. J

Cellular phones have both benefits and shortcomings, however, with the advent of technology and the growing need for easy communication, the benefits outweighs the problems of using cellular phones. Today, almost all people from all walks of life has cellular phones not only because of the main uses but also for the added features available for different types or brands of cell phones. In today’s world, it is hard to imagine someone who can survive without the use of cell phones since it has become today’s most widely used medium of communication. In this fast- pacing environment, one can’t get enough of just having cellular phones; others have two or even three cell phones for different uses and purposes to make life better. All in all, it is safe to say at least for now that cellular phones have become a constant factor in the day- to- day lives of everyone.